Jarhyn
Wizard
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2010
- Messages
- 17,440
- Gender
- Androgyne; they/them
- Basic Beliefs
- Natural Philosophy, Game Theoretic Ethicist
What's wrong with me having rights at a "full level" now?Liberals want to allow trans rights at a full level.
What's wrong with me having rights at a "full level" now?Liberals want to allow trans rights at a full level.
That’s great question. What is wrong with Jarhyn having full rights as a citizen?What's wrong with me having rights at a "full level" now?Liberals want to allow trans rights at a full level.
There's nothing wrong with it. We just have different opinions we just see things differently.That’s great question. What is wrong with Jarhyn having full rights as a citizen?What's wrong with me having rights at a "full level" now?Liberals want to allow trans rights at a full level.
What are the things that Republicans stand for that are "good things?" Oppression of minorities? Theocratic absolutism? Destruction of democracy? Minority Rule? Poverty wages for the working class? Tax loopholes for billionaires? Banning (or burning) books from libraries?But remember the things they stand for are good things. Liberals want to allow for full trans rights and lgbtq rigths. Liberals want to allow there to be a different gender besides male and female. Biden is responsible for allowing so many migrants to be here. Liberals want to allow so many illegals to be here as well as having almost open borders.
There laws are good because liberals are trying to trying to change this country in a very dangerous way.
If you are entering politics you might want to clarify that just a tad. What is "trans rights at a full level", why are you against it and why are you fine with Jarhyn having full rights when that clearly contradicts your previous statement?There's nothing wrong with it. We just have different opinions we just see things differently.
Different opinions on me "having rights at a full level". So either you see something wrong with it or you are a "liberal".There's nothing wrong with it. We just have different opinions we just see things differently.That’s great question. What is wrong with Jarhyn having full rights as a citizen?What's wrong with me having rights at a "full level" now?Liberals want to allow trans rights at a full level.
Now that is political pedigree Say something controversial, get asked about it, and answer in such a way to appear thoughtful despite effectively ignoring the question.There's nothing wrong with it. We just have different opinions we just see things differently.That’s great question. What is wrong with Jarhyn having full rights as a citizen?What's wrong with me having rights at a "full level" now?Liberals want to allow trans rights at a full level.
But remember the things they stand for are good things. Liberals want to allow for full trans rights and lgbtq rigths. Liberals want to allow there to be a different gender besides male and female. Biden is responsible for allowing so many migrants to be here. Liberals want to allow so many illegals to be here as well as having almost open borders.
There laws are good because liberals are trying to trying to change this country in a very dangerous way.
So you're a liberal? Or you want to mete out rights at "levels" that comport with your fucking OPINION?There's nothing wrong with it. We just have different opinions we just see things differently.That’s great question. What is wrong with Jarhyn having full rights as a citizen?What's wrong with me having rights at a "full level" now?Liberals want to allow trans rights at a full level.
1900 America was out what it was in 1800. 2023 America is not what it was in 2000.But remember the things they stand for are good things. Liberals want to allow for full trans rights and lgbtq rigths. Liberals want to allow there to be a different gender besides male and female. Biden is responsible for allowing so many migrants to be here. Liberals want to allow so many illegals to be here as well as having almost open borders.But yeah everyone I feel represents me is Trump, Johnson and Ron Desantis.
Those three are who all represent me.
I find all three of those men to be bad human beings who harm others with a smile on their face.
They *are* the High School Bullies (tm)
I’m you were trying to decide what to say to move me from “this fellow doesn’t seem genuine” straight over to “I don’t have any space in my life for that kind of fellow,” you found it.
Have fun worshipping the bullies. Ironically, they wouldn’t give you the time of day, let alone the attention and advice this forum has given you. They are terrible human beings. But if that’s who you want to give your lunch money to, you should go open an account at the extremist social forum that Trump owns. I can’t imagine why you would want to hang around here or seek advice from us.
There laws are good because liberals are trying to trying to change this country in a very dangerous way.
Yes I am.Your right
Incredible how quickly you put your cart behind a horse you never heard of a week before.Your right I didn't know him before he got elected however I choose him as one of my three though because of where he stands on issues and how he received a unanimous vote to be elected speaker. I still choose Trump and Ron Desantis as well though.I mean, anyone that can say Trump is their "Republican" can't possibly be into politics. Trump isn't a Republican. He isn't a politician. He has no positions other than "Trump!"
I doubt Nighthawk had ever heard of Rep. Johnson before he won the Speakership vote. I know I hadn't.
Prob’ly the idea of coddling billionaire tax cheats appeals to aspiring GOP Pres contenders.Incredible how quickly you put your cart behind a horse you never heard of a week before.Your right I didn't know him before he got elected however I choose him as one of my three though because of where he stands on issues and how he received a unanimous vote to be elected speaker. I still choose Trump and Ron Desantis as well though.I mean, anyone that can say Trump is their "Republican" can't possibly be into politics. Trump isn't a Republican. He isn't a politician. He has no positions other than "Trump!"
I doubt Nighthawk had ever heard of Rep. Johnson before he won the Speakership vote. I know I hadn't.
Like I said it is more than just one person I feel represents me in the party I was gonna say trump as well.
But yeah everyone I feel represents me is Trump, Johnson and Ron Desantis.
Those three are who all represent me.
laughing dog said:What is it about each of those men that leads you to say they "represent you"? I ask, because I have a brother who voted for Mr. Trump in order to stick it to the elites/liberals but who did not think Mr. Trump represented him.
Frankly, all 3 of those particular examples make me, a white male US citizen, ashamed to be a US white male citizen.
I don't understand what "allow trans right at a full level" even means. What "rights" do trans want that others already have that you object to?NightHawkBuzz said:They represent me because of what they stand for. Liberals want to allow trans rights at a full level. Liberals want to allow for open borders and allow illegal immigrants to come into this country at a high rate. These three men don't stand for any of these things and more this is why they represent me.
Yeah I’d suggest testing the waters by trying out for local dog catcher, but I care too deeply for dogs.Unless you live in a solid MAGA electoral area, you might want to rethink embracing such politicians.
I don't even find that surprising. Mike Johnson wasn't a household name, but he was a known quantity. Easy to find out more about, if you pay any attention.Incredible how quickly you put your cart behind a horse you never heard of a week before.
Not if you spell colours wrong. Yes I am dying on this hill because I am wear armour not made of al-oooooo-mee-yum. It will protect me.Yes I am.Your right
And that’s “you’re”, which is a contraction of “you are”. “Your” is the possessive form.
It would work like this, if I wanted to dismiss a person’s ability due to their habitual misuse of American English: “You’re too illiterate to serve in any position of responsibility, even if your illiteracy creates a sense of fraternity with the dumbest and most ignorant segments of society.”
We can work on colors tomorrow.
We don’t say “alumium” either.Not if you spell colours wrong. Yes I am dying on this hill because I am wear armour not made of al-oooooo-mee-yum. It will protect me.Yes I am.Your right
And that’s “you’re”, which is a contraction of “you are”. “Your” is the possessive form.
It would work like this, if I wanted to dismiss a person’s ability due to their habitual misuse of American English: “You’re too illiterate to serve in any position of responsibility, even if your illiteracy creates a sense of fraternity with the dumbest and most ignorant segments of society.”
We can work on colors tomorrow.
because I am wear armour not made of
No eating in class!because I am wear armour not made of
< snickers > at the language lesson
Tom