The breakup of Yugoslavia was inevitable, thirty years before NATO was even thought of.
Then how come it lasted for 35 years.
35 years?
Yugoslavia lasted from it's foolhardy inception in 1918 (for the first ten years under the unwieldy name "The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes", before "Yugoslavia" was adopted to the great relief of teachers of Balkan geography everywhere), until its eventual and inevitable collapse in 1992.
The Serbs not only started WWI; They won it*. And by doing so, they won the ability to expand the sovereignty of the Serbian King to include what had previously been parts of the neighbouring empires (the Ottomans and Austro-Hungarians), who had lost the war and collapsed.
Serbian military strength allowed the Monarchy to hold together the new country by force, until the Nazis invaded in 1941; The Nazis sided with the Croats (and vice-versa), deepening the Serb-Croat enmity (an impressive feat, as it was already profound); But then the Nazis lost to the Soviets, and Russia once again provided the clout to hold a Serbian dominated Yugoslavia together, by their initial support of Tito, who, with both Soviet and Western backing, ruled the country with an iron fist - Indeed, Tito was so effective as a Communist dictator, that he was able to tell Stalin to go fuck himself, when the USSR tried to consolidate all of Eastern Europe as Soviet satellite states.
Throughout the existence of Yugoslavia, Croat resistance and revolution against Serbian rule was a constant threat. Croatia attempted several times to break away, notably in the early 1970s (the "Croat Spring"); But at that time, both sides in the Cold War were adamant in their desire to keep Yugoslavia unified and peaceful at all costs. Conflict in the Balkans started WWI, and there was a genuine and justifed fear that it could also start WWIII.
The death of Tito in 1980 was a major blow to Yugoslavia's fragile unity as a nation; The collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union was the last straw.
The country lasted just 74 years.
Where do you get "35 years" from?
NATO has its eyes everywhere. They don't miss an opportunity.
This sounds like wild conspiracist nonsense.
I don't blame them. We understand that very well.
That is why US issues regular reports about India on freedom of expression or religion, etc.
I am not sure what you are trying to get at here.
It
seems that you view routine observations about the behaviour and attitudes of other nations, made by the USA, as some kind of evidence that NATO is a nefarious and shadowy organisation bent on the destruction of peace in Yugoslavia, for unstated reasons.
But that can't be what you actually think, because it would be an insane idea, based on a huge mess of counterfactuals and misunderstandings.
The USA is not NATO. Reports by nations about other nations are not remarkable. Yugoslavia never had any peace or unity to destroy, other than the peace that comes from ruthless supression of even a hint of dissent, by overwhelming use of force.
Nobody could have prevented the breakup of Yugoslavia, once the Cold War imperative to stamp out any hint of violence in the Balkans had gone away.
* With much assistance from their allied imperial powers, particularly Russia - the Russian Empire, unlike Serbia, did not survive to be victorious; But Russia and Serbia remained close allies even after the change in Russian dictatorial title from Tsar to First Secretary, due to their deep ethnic and cultural similarities.
