• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Merged Mar-a-Largo raided by FBI?

To denote when two or more threads have been merged
ZiprHead said:
Trump wants Justice Department to pay him $100 million for alleged damages from FBI’s Mar-a-Lago search

Lawyers for Donald Trump have filed a $100 million claim with the Justice Department, alleging that the federal search of Mar-a-Lago in August 2022 was inappropriate and hurt Trump’s reputation, an attempt to keep alive the narrative that the former president has been persecuted by a biased Biden administration.

The administrative claim for alleged damages is unlikely to gain steam given that the search was approved by a federal judge after months of investigation and negotiations with Trump’s lawyers. The claim has been filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which allows people wronged by government employees to seek compensation from federal agencies.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Trump’s lawyers are desperate to get paid.
 
LoAmmo said:
Then they shouldn’t have agreed to represent a known serial grifter who’s stiffed WAY too many people he’s owed money to for them to suddenly act shocked.
Click to expand...
The Fed is not liable for Trump’s unpaid legal bills. Poor Donny; this is just going to run up his balance due.
 
I believe the deal regarding ownership was that place was not supposed to be a residence. Him making it a residence is causing these problems.
 
laughing dog said:
Jimmy Higgins said:
I believe the deal regarding ownership was that place was not supposed to be a residence. Him making it a residence is causing these problems.
Click to expand...
I am shocked you suggest Mr Art of the Deal is violating one. Absolutely shocked!!!!
Click to expand...
If I recall, he found a loop hole by making himself an employee.
 
"Reindicted and it feels so good..."

Special counsel files reworked indictment against Donald Trump in January 6 case

“The superseding indictment, which was presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in this case, reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions in Trump v. United States,” the special counsel’s office said.

The replacement indictment thrusts the question of Trump’s effort to steal the 2020 election back into the critical final months of the 2024 campaign. For much of this year, the ex-president’s legal and political narratives merged through his claims that he was the victim of a conspiracy by the Biden administration to weaponize justice against him.
Click to expand...

So they put the claims up for another grand jury without the stuff the Supreme Court (stupidly) said couldn't be used and they still said "Book him, Dano."
 
JFC!!! Another one.

www.propublica.org

Judge Aileen Cannon Failed to Disclose a Right-Wing Junket

Cannon, whose oversight of the Donald Trump classified documents case has garnered widespread criticism, has repeatedly violated a rule requiring that federal judges disclose their attendance at private seminars.
www.propublica.org www.propublica.org

Federal Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the controversial jurist who tossed out the classified documents criminal case against Donald Trump in July, failed to disclose her attendance at a May 2023 banquet funded by a conservative law school.

Cannon went to an event in Arlington, Va. honoring the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, according to documents obtained from the Law and Economics Center at George Mason University. At a lecture and private dinner, she sat among members of Scalia’s family, fellow Federalist Society members and more than 30 conservative federal judges. Organizers billed the event as “an excellent opportunity to connect with judicial colleagues.”

A 2006 rule, intended to shine a light on judges’ attendance at paid seminars that could pose conflicts or influence decisions, requires them to file disclosure forms for such trips within 30 days and make them public on the court’s website.

It’s not the first time she has failed to fully comply with the rule.
Click to expand...
 
ZiprHead said:
JFC!!! Another one.

www.propublica.org

Judge Aileen Cannon Failed to Disclose a Right-Wing Junket

Cannon, whose oversight of the Donald Trump classified documents case has garnered widespread criticism, has repeatedly violated a rule requiring that federal judges disclose their attendance at private seminars.
www.propublica.org www.propublica.org

Federal Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the controversial jurist who tossed out the classified documents criminal case against Donald Trump in July, failed to disclose her attendance at a May 2023 banquet funded by a conservative law school.

Cannon went to an event in Arlington, Va. honoring the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, according to documents obtained from the Law and Economics Center at George Mason University. At a lecture and private dinner, she sat among members of Scalia’s family, fellow Federalist Society members and more than 30 conservative federal judges. Organizers billed the event as “an excellent opportunity to connect with judicial colleagues.”

A 2006 rule, intended to shine a light on judges’ attendance at paid seminars that could pose conflicts or influence decisions, requires them to file disclosure forms for such trips within 30 days and make them public on the court’s website.

It’s not the first time she has failed to fully comply with the rule.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I'm not losing sleep over this. It isn't like this influenced her judicial rulings. She is a fraud and there is something more nefarious behind her rulings.
 
Jimmy Higgins said:
ZiprHead said:
JFC!!! Another one.

www.propublica.org

Judge Aileen Cannon Failed to Disclose a Right-Wing Junket

Cannon, whose oversight of the Donald Trump classified documents case has garnered widespread criticism, has repeatedly violated a rule requiring that federal judges disclose their attendance at private seminars.
www.propublica.org www.propublica.org

Federal Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the controversial jurist who tossed out the classified documents criminal case against Donald Trump in July, failed to disclose her attendance at a May 2023 banquet funded by a conservative law school.

Cannon went to an event in Arlington, Va. honoring the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, according to documents obtained from the Law and Economics Center at George Mason University. At a lecture and private dinner, she sat among members of Scalia’s family, fellow Federalist Society members and more than 30 conservative federal judges. Organizers billed the event as “an excellent opportunity to connect with judicial colleagues.”

A 2006 rule, intended to shine a light on judges’ attendance at paid seminars that could pose conflicts or influence decisions, requires them to file disclosure forms for such trips within 30 days and make them public on the court’s website.

It’s not the first time she has failed to fully comply with the rule.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I'm not losing sleep over this. It isn't like this influenced her judicial rulings. She is a fraud and there is something more nefarious behind her rulings.
Click to expand...
Something more nefarious? You mean like The Federalist Society writes the rulings and she just stamps them through? What’s wrong with something like that?
 
scombrid said:
Jimmy Higgins said:
ZiprHead said:
JFC!!! Another one.

www.propublica.org

Judge Aileen Cannon Failed to Disclose a Right-Wing Junket

Cannon, whose oversight of the Donald Trump classified documents case has garnered widespread criticism, has repeatedly violated a rule requiring that federal judges disclose their attendance at private seminars.
www.propublica.org www.propublica.org

Federal Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the controversial jurist who tossed out the classified documents criminal case against Donald Trump in July, failed to disclose her attendance at a May 2023 banquet funded by a conservative law school.

Cannon went to an event in Arlington, Va. honoring the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, according to documents obtained from the Law and Economics Center at George Mason University. At a lecture and private dinner, she sat among members of Scalia’s family, fellow Federalist Society members and more than 30 conservative federal judges. Organizers billed the event as “an excellent opportunity to connect with judicial colleagues.”

A 2006 rule, intended to shine a light on judges’ attendance at paid seminars that could pose conflicts or influence decisions, requires them to file disclosure forms for such trips within 30 days and make them public on the court’s website.

It’s not the first time she has failed to fully comply with the rule.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I'm not losing sleep over this. It isn't like this influenced her judicial rulings. She is a fraud and there is something more nefarious behind her rulings.
Click to expand...
Something more nefarious? You mean like The Federalist Society writes the rulings and she just stamps them through? What’s wrong with something like that?
Click to expand...
She is way off the reservation with her rulings. She shouldn't be on the bench after being embarrasses by the Appelate Court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom