Multiple casualties at Pittsburgh synagogue - Shooter says "All these Jews need to die"

[GenesisNemesis]

And don't ever forget that it's the general climate of hate and fear that arrived overnight with the orange nazi that enables scum like this.

Reading of these events from Australia you have had shooting like this long before Trump was elected.
The climate of hate and fear of which you speak existed before Trump and will continue to exist after he is gone.

Why do you yanks shoot first and don't ask questions later?

Yeah it's totally not a problem that the leader of a country has been expressing unhinged, paranoid beliefs. Not a problem at all.

 

[Max Rockatansky]

It's definitely enabled by trumpo.

Unsurprisingly, the guy is also a devout true-xtian. LIRC must be so proud.

Agreed that Trump's hateful rhetoric and alignment with the Alt-Right enables fanatics but your anti-"xtian" zinger makes it difficult for me to distinguish between Left and Right Wing haters. If Trump is dividing the country with his hateful rhetoric, how are you different from him?

What does "LIRC" mean?

 

[Angry Floof]

It's definitely enabled by trumpo.

Unsurprisingly, the guy is also a devout true-xtian. LIRC must be so proud.

Agreed that Trump's hateful rhetoric and alignment with the Alt-Right enables fanatics but your anti-"xtian" zinger makes it difficult for me to distinguish between Left and Right Wing haters. If Trump is dividing the country with his hateful rhetoric, how are you different from him?

Here's a hint. One says things you don't like and the other goes out and kills people.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-responding-active-shooter-pittsburgh-synagogue/story?id=58790381



https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/201...agogue-in-squirrel-hill/#.W9R8JJn-enc.twitter

He was reportedly armed with an AR-15 style weapon, along with at least 2 handguns.

Another "good guy with a gun"

No, he was a bad guy with a gun who could have been stopped, and was, by good guys with guns. Sad that whenever we have a gun tragedy, anti-gun people quickly dance on the bodies of the dead to push their anti-gun agenda.

Okay folks, here is the deal, there isn't some sort of natural law that requires at least one good guy with a gun to be around where one bad guy is with a gun. Not some sort of positron is fucked because an electron will come in contact almost immediately and be eradicated.

This means that when a bad guy has a gun and is intent on murdering a lot of people, there is a good chance that there won't be a good guy with a gun to kill him first. After all, the bad guy has to start killing to make it clear he is a bad guy with a gun intent on killing lots of people (they don't wear special hats). So even if there is a good guy, there will be killing first before any suppression. And in the case of no good guy in the immediate area, lots of people can and will (and have) die(d).

I'm sorry that people that really love guns don't like hearing about it, but... yes, if those guns didn't exist, those people wouldn't have been killed. You need to accept that the solution to too many homicidal Americans with guns isn't armed guards at every damn building in the country. You just need to accept that this killing is going to happen, because we certainly aren't seeing the guns rise up and be raptured, and your support of those weapons is one of the reasons. The truth will set you free. It'll be depressing, but hey, at least you still have your health, right?

 

[Max Rockatansky]

And don't ever forget that it's the general climate of hate and fear that arrived overnight with the orange nazi that enables scum like this.

Reading of these events from Australia you have had shooting like this long before Trump was elected.
The climate of hate and fear of which you speak existed before Trump and will continue to exist after he is gone.

Why do you yanks shoot first and don't ask questions later?

The bomber was following Trump's rhetoric. This shooter was following his own. He is so radical, he hates just about everyone.

Unknown about the shooter yet. The Alt-Right is antisemitic....much like most of Europope.

 

[Tigers!]

And don't ever forget that it's the general climate of hate and fear that arrived overnight with the orange nazi that enables scum like this.

Reading of these events from Australia you have had shooting like this long before Trump was elected.
The climate of hate and fear of which you speak existed before Trump and will continue to exist after he is gone.

Why do you yanks shoot first and don't ask questions later?

Yeah it's totally not a problem that the leader of a country has been expressing unhinged, paranoid beliefs. Not a problem at all.

And yet you clowns over there elected him. He was an idiot before the election, he is an idiot now and will be an idiot after he leaves.
I still cannot believe that out of greater than 300 million people your system threw up 2 candidates against each other that were unelectable in their own unique way.
I could/would not have have voted for either Clinton or Trump.

 

[Max Rockatansky]

https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-responding-active-shooter-pittsburgh-synagogue/story?id=58790381



https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/201...agogue-in-squirrel-hill/#.W9R8JJn-enc.twitter

He was reportedly armed with an AR-15 style weapon, along with at least 2 handguns.

Another "good guy with a gun"

No, he was a bad guy with a gun who could have been stopped, and was, by good guys with guns. Sad that whenever we have a gun tragedy, anti-gun people quickly dance on the bodies of the dead to push their anti-gun agenda.

Okay folks, here is the deal, there isn't some sort of natural law that requires at least one good guy with a gun to be around where one bad guy is with a gun. Not some sort of positron is fucked because an electron will come in contact almost immediately and be eradicated.

This means that when a bad guy has a gun and is intent on murdering a lot of people, there is a good chance that there won't be a good guy with a gun to kill him first. After all, the bad guy has to start killing to make it clear he is a bad guy with a gun intent on killing lots of people (they don't wear special hats). So even if there is a good guy, there will be killing first before any suppression. And in the case of no good guy in the immediate area, lots of people can and will (and have) die(d).

I'm sorry that people that really love guns don't like hearing about it, but... yes, if those guns didn't exist, those people wouldn't have been killed. You need to accept that the solution to too many homicidal Americans with guns isn't armed guards at every damn building in the country. You just need to accept that this killing is going to happen, because we certainly aren't seeing the guns rise up and be raptured, and your support of those weapons is one of the reasons. The truth will set you free. It'll be depressing, but hey, at least you still have your health, right?

...and the anti-gun Left's solution is to disarm all the innocent, law-abiding Americans so only the bad guys have guns. Jesus fucking Christ, who is really lying to themselves?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Okay folks, here is the deal, there isn't some sort of natural law that requires at least one good guy with a gun to be around where one bad guy is with a gun. Not some sort of positron is fucked because an electron will come in contact almost immediately and be eradicated.

This means that when a bad guy has a gun and is intent on murdering a lot of people, there is a good chance that there won't be a good guy with a gun to kill him first. After all, the bad guy has to start killing to make it clear he is a bad guy with a gun intent on killing lots of people (they don't wear special hats). So even if there is a good guy, there will be killing first before any suppression. And in the case of no good guy in the immediate area, lots of people can and will (and have) die(d).

I'm sorry that people that really love guns don't like hearing about it, but... yes, if those guns didn't exist, those people wouldn't have been killed. You need to accept that the solution to too many homicidal Americans with guns isn't armed guards at every damn building in the country. You just need to accept that this killing is going to happen, because we certainly aren't seeing the guns rise up and be raptured, and your support of those weapons is one of the reasons. The truth will set you free. It'll be depressing, but hey, at least you still have your health, right?

...and the anti-gun Left's solution is to disarm all the innocent, law-abiding Americans so only the bad guys have guns. Jesus fucking Christ, who is really lying to themselves?

You are, as I didn't suggest getting rid of guns. There are too many out there, and the will for people to give them up doesn't exist. Therefore, as I noted in my post:

I'm sorry that people that really love guns don't like hearing about it, but... yes, if those guns didn't exist, those people wouldn't have been killed. You need to accept that the solution to too many homicidal Americans with guns isn't armed guards at every damn building in the country. You just need to accept that this killing is going to happen, because we certainly aren't seeing the guns rise up and be raptured, and your support of those weapons is one of the reasons. The truth will set you free. It'll be depressing, but hey, at least you still have your health, right?

#expendablesecondamendmentcollateraldamage

 

[Max Rockatansky]

You are, as I didn't suggest getting rid of guns.....

Of course you didn't. Anti-gunners know they can't repeal the Second Amendment. They have to chip away at it piece by incremental piece. They know that if they suggest banning guns, over half of America would be against them, so they just dance around the issue....like you did.

The fact remains it's the anti-gunners who whine America has a "gun problem" while ignoring mental illness, especially suicide in both the US and especially in countries where guns are banned or strictly controlled.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

You are, as I didn't suggest getting rid of guns.....

Of course you didn't. Anti-gunners know they can't repeal the Second Amendment. They have to chip away at it piece by incremental piece. They know that if they suggest banning guns, over half of America would be against them, so they just dance around the issue....like you did.

The fact remains it's the anti-gunners who whine America has a "gun problem" while ignoring mental illness, especially suicide in both the US and especially in countries where guns are banned or strictly controlled.

View attachment 18395

You are making this thread about liberals and guns. A right winger did this. With guns.

 

[TSwizzle]

Another individual with mental health problems with access to guns. The signs are there, need to start acting on these signs.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

But you said not to take guns away from all the conservatives!

 

[Lion IRC]

It's definitely enabled by trumpo.

Unsurprisingly, the guy is also a devout true-xtian. LIRC must be so proud.

...What does "LIRC" mean?

It's someone's psychodrama. A meme relating to the old-fashioned analog fake ignore function.
https://talkfreethought.org/search.php?searchid=780541

 

[RavenSky]

...and the anti-gun Left's solution is to disarm all the innocent, law-abiding Americans so only the bad guys have guns.

Max wants to disarm people based on JUST THEIR THOUGHTS!!!!!! HE'S THE THOUGHT POLICE!!!!

 

[Max Rockatansky]

...and the anti-gun Left's solution is to disarm all the innocent, law-abiding Americans so only the bad guys have guns.

Max wants to disarm people based on JUST THEIR THOUGHTS!!!!!! HE'S THE THOUGHT POLICE!!!!

While an interesting accusation, it's also a false accusation. Why do you claim this, sir?

 

[RavenSky]

...and the anti-gun Left's solution is to disarm all the innocent, law-abiding Americans so only the bad guys have guns.

Max wants to disarm people based on JUST THEIR THOUGHTS!!!!!! HE'S THE THOUGHT POLICE!!!!

While an interesting accusation, it's also a false accusation. Why do you claim this, sir?

Well, the other option is that you DO want to arm the "bad guys". Which is it?

 

[Ford]

While an interesting accusation, it's also a false accusation. Why do you claim this, sir?

Well, the other option is that you DO want to arm the "bad guys". Which is it?

Pretty sure the implication is that if everyone is armed, the shootouts will favor the "good guys with guns" every time.

Had Rabbi Rambo been packin', these Jews would still be livin'.

(I mean yeah, there might be some collateral damage but that's just the price of freedom)

 

[phands]

The fact that three pre-prepared policemen were injured gives the lie to an on-premises guard being anything other than the first death utterly risible.

 

[RavenSky]

The fact that three pre-prepared policemen were injured gives the lie to an on-premises guard being anything other than the first death utterly risible.

yep.

I find it interesting that gun nuts don't seem to mind at all that police officers are shot at and killed by good guys with guns.

 

[Ford]

The fact that three pre-prepared policemen were injured gives the lie to an on-premises guard being anything other than the first death utterly risible.

According to the National Gun Nut Organization, the effectiveness of armed people is as follows:

3. Cops. Ineffective agents of the Deep State.

2. Security Guards. Better than police, but not better than...

1. Intrepid armed citizens. You never hear about most attempted mass shootings because when the perp sniffs the slightest whiff of an intrepid armed citizen, they abandon their plans and slink off into obscurity. Bad guys with guns dare not challenge the good guys with guns.