It makes sense to blame it on something like retaliation for US drone srikes. But they've killed over cartoons in the past. So there may not be a reason we can understand. In their minds dead babies in drone strikes might be below cartoons of the prophet. Strange people do strange things.
I guess I don't understand the stretch in logic. They have killed people down the street in the past for drawing cartoons.
Yes, god forbid the West ever pay for it's crimes.
It only matters if you want to understand. If they killed because the US killed their young childten, it makes more sense then French cartoonists mocking their prophet. They've historically killed for both.
I'm more scared of the second since there is not much logic involved with killing people and blowing yourself up over a cartoon.
Yes, god forbid the West ever pay for it's crimes.
Oh, fuck off already.
Do you know any?The question is; How many Muslims are terrorists because of harm done to them or people they care about by the US or some other Western power?
Why not. Everyone is saying they attacked France because of US policy. When they have historically attacked France because they publish cartoons mocking their prophet.
I guess somehow, it makes sense to assume new attacks are proxy attacks against the US and not based on past attacks on France.
The European countries with the highest percentage of Muslims are, in this order, Kosovo (close to 90%), Albania (around 60%), Bosnia-Herzegovina (40%), Macedonia (30%), Montenegro (19%), Bulgaria (13%). There have been wars in Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina within my lifetime, but the general consensus seems to be that they were instigated by Serb nationalists (i.e. anti-Muslim bigots like you); Albania is pretty fucked up too, and probably one of the two poorest countries in Europe (alongside Moldavia), but it was mostly fucked up by a dictatorship eccentric even by the standards of realsoc dictatorships, and one that had proudly declared Albania to be the world's first atheist nation. Macedonia has seen comparatively lower levels of interethnic violence, mostly as a spillover from the Kosovo conflict, but the ideology of the perpetrators was one of nationalism, not religious fundamentalism. The others are basically regular (South-)Eastern European countries - poor by Western standards and with significant levels of government corruption, but religious extremism isn't what holds them back. So tell me again how "[There are enough Muslim terrorists] to cause mayhem whenever there are significant number of Muslims: (...) Europe (...) etc."Enough to cause mayhem whenever there are significant number of Muslims: Israel, India, Europe, US, Indonesia, etc.
Do you know any?The question is; How many Muslims are terrorists because of harm done to them or people they care about by the US or some other Western power?
The Charlie Hebdo shooters for example were disenfranchised French muslims, who were never harmed by the US. The terrorists do have pasts, but usually it's that of being brainwashed than being victim of US aggression in Middle East.
iSIS wants western enemies. It's getting them."So France will be pitiless in its response to the Islamic State militants," he said, vowing to "use all means within the law.. on every battleground here and abroad together with our allies".
And so it goes.
I guess I don't understand the stretch in logic. They have killed people down the street in the past for drawing cartoons.
And winning in the past is why our genetic material is here. We have been genocidal motherfuckers since at least chimpanzee (or similar) times. Accept it as reality, so when you see it you are not shocked.
Hitler, Pol Pot.... We all can go into a killing frenzy against other tribes. And the ones ready to kill right away instead of feeling guilty about it survived.
And not killing each other but working together etc... Yeah we can be violent vicious beasts, but we are here for reasons other then killing other members o our species.And winning in the past is why our genetic material is here. We have been genocidal motherfuckers since at least chimpanzee (or similar) times. Accept it as reality, so when you see it you are not shocked.
Hitler, Pol Pot.... We all can go into a killing frenzy against other tribes. And the ones ready to kill right away instead of feeling guilty about it survived.
We're here because of fucking. Despite Hitleer, Pol pot, et al.
I guess I don't understand the stretch in logic. They have killed people down the street in the past for drawing cartoons.
People have never been killed for 'drawing cartoons'. They have been killed for deliberately and pointlessly insulting other people's religion, as you know. If someone kicks you in the balls, laddie, you will have objections. Think on!
Stop calling wars terrorist attacks.Do you know any?
The Charlie Hebdo shooters for example were disenfranchised French muslims, who were never harmed by the US. The terrorists do have pasts, but usually it's that of being brainwashed than being victim of US aggression in Middle East.
The double standards are nauseating.
One has absolutely no right to complain about innocents being killed in France unless one complains loudly about all the innocents killed by the US all the time.
And of course France has it's own history of abuse of Muslims in Algeria.
But your response is an evasion.
People like to cry about how 911 changed the world. Pure nonsense. Nothing changed. The US was still full of a bunch of ignorant psychopaths.
What changed the world was the US terrorist attack of Iraq.
It replaced Hussein with ISIS.
That is the good work all the US violence did. But of course the ignorant psychopaths remain so there will be nothing but calls for more violence.
"So France will be pitiless in its response to the Islamic State militants," he said, vowing to "use all means within the law.. on every battleground here and abroad together with our allies".
And so it goes.