Except that, in an environment in which the target audience is "humans", that's a losing strategy. Humans love conflict and taking "sides". They eat up oppositional games like a dung beetle eats shit. And since the point is not to "tell the truth" but rather "attract viewers so as to sell advertisement time", the more lucrative and thus successful strategy is to sell a "side", particularly a "side" that doesn't strongly oppose "the side of the moneyed media".
I think there is very much a market for news that does its best to be objective and not take a side, especially with all the media that is so polarized and political.




