• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Tara Reade is a person who exists

Evidence Casts Doubt on Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Allegations of Joe Biden

Alexandra Tara Reade’s accusations of sexual assault against Joe Biden appear very questionable once the story is fully investigated.

Pretty thorough article.

Thanks for that. I have read some shorter articles about this woman and I had decided that her story was a lie. I also think that the reason that Biden said to always believe the woman is because he never believed that some woman would falsely accuse him of sexual assault. That was a bit naive of him, but I've always thought he was a pretty decent man, especially for politician. Sure, some people felt a bit uncomfortable by his affectionate nature. That's understandable. But, I think he's learned not to give so much unwelcome affection after so many women complained. While I support the #me too movement, sadly, it has also been a way for dishonest women to take advantage of innocent men when they had an alternative motive. Let's not pretend that all women are always honest.

Another example is Al Franken. Franken has always been a very affectionate person, but then for some reason, suddenly three conservative women made absurd claims about him. Then, a liberal woman started a movement to force him out of the Senate. Men sometimes simply need to be told that their affection is unwelcome, but affection is not the same as sexual assault. In fact, I hate that some of my male friends are now afraid to hug their female friends. As a person who likes friendly hugs, I feel a loss. We are apes and our closest ape relative like hugging. If you don't like to be hugged, just say so.

I am so tired of people making up false claims about Biden. We have two choices. The voters have decided. Trump or Biden are those two choices. If you are so idealistic and stupid that you will only vote for the perfect candidate, than you will always be disappointed. No candidate or leader has ever been perfect. Even the most respected in history have made mistake and fuck ups. Deal with it and just hope that everyone will be able to vote without difficulty this fall so we can rid ourselves of the most corrupt, incompetent, narcissistic leader that we've ever seen in this country.
 
"How dare they question a woman's lived experience?"
Isn't that what we keep hearing when a woman claims a SCOTUS nominee raped her 30 years ago when he was 17, or that the president raped her in a Barney's changing room or simply that some lacrosse players at Duke raped her during a party? Why is this so different that we do not hear "women don't lie about rape" and "women should always be believed" by radical feminists?
The point is to believe (instead of an automatic dismissal response of the rape apologists) and investigate. In other words, take the accusation seriously enough to investigate.

How hard is that really to understand?

Might I add that there is a difference between believing something that another person says/writes and using that to make a judgment about whether you support someone for public office--or invite them to dinner or let your kid babysit at their house or stay the night at a sleep over VS having enough evidence to charge, prosecute and convict an accused person.

For example: I did not require E.Jean Carroll's allegations nor the allegations made by the couple of dozen other women against Trump to believe that he is a creep and sexual predator. His own words were sufficient for that. Frankly, I did not need those disgusting words caught on tape to think that Trump is unfit in every way to be POTUS. His proclivities of regarding women as objects to be used whenever he wants is simply another disgusting layer of moral failure on top of many other layers of moral failure which frankly are trivial in comparison with his mental decline and general ineptitude and the fact that he has none of the skills nor the requisite traits to acquire those skills or even to recognize his own deficits to be an even semi-competent POTUS. I almost wish that they wouldn't talk about his moral failings, sexual assaults, the abysmal way he treats women, his views on minorities, and so on because as disgusting as those all are, they pale in comparison to his lack of character in general, his total lack of integrity, and his total unfitness for the position in which he is now placed. I cannot say 'serves' because I don't think he serves in any normal way of understanding the word.

I think that all of this talk of his racism, his sexism, his violence against women is just a distraction away from his gross incompetence. BTW, I think the racism, the sexism and his history of violence against women (or anyone else) are absolutely disqualifying if taken each one alone, much less together. But even taken together, those are just trivial compared to his lack of ability in any meaningful way to carry out the duties of POTUS and his inability to recognize his shortcomings. He is a walking --or waddling clusterfuck of a president and I am heartily ashamed of the entire human race that he was ever elected even hall monitor.

Reading the transcript of Tara Reade's account of what happened brings up some practical questions for me. I am not bothered by an evolving or changing story. If things happened as she describes, it would be traumatic and shocking. Most trauma victims do not clearly remember all details of the traumatic event immediately. Instead, bits and pieces come back. So, that doesn't bother me. Some of the more practical points do. The description she gives of events make it seem unlikely that what she says happened actually happened. But perhaps something similar did happen. That would be an extremely dramatic departure from other 'questionable' behavior described by other women, the most serious of which is that Biden apparently touched the thigh of a young woman seated next to him at a conference. Which may or may not have been intentional or may or may not have had (from Biden's perspective) any sexual connotations while it might well have seemed to be a sexual overture to the young woman.

There are many reasons that I don't find Joe Biden to be a great candidate but he's the one we're stuck with. Because apparently it's much more important to nominate doddering old white guys as the 'safe' candidate than to nominate say: a woman with extremely good credentials and demonstrated leadership. I've been dealing with this shit all my life and I no longer allow myself to be disappointed or surprised. Men are afraid of women in power. They feel reassured by old white men.
 
babylonherdimmunity.jpg
 
Yeah, there’s a difference between celebrity groupies and Congressional interns. Kinda like a big difference.

Yeah - you only get to bang ONE intern groupie for every TWENTY regular groupies.
- "I'm not a Trumpsucker"s

Lame-assed excuse.
 
Yeah, there’s a difference between celebrity groupies and Congressional interns. Kinda like a big difference.

So true. Everyone knows that when you hang out with celebrities, they automatically get to rape you, amiright?
 
Yeah, there’s a difference between celebrity groupies and Congressional interns. Kinda like a big difference.

Yeah - you only get to bang ONE intern groupie for every TWENTY regular groupies.
- "I'm not a Trumpsucker"s

Lame-assed excuse.
Yeah, only the feeble-minded feel whataboutisms are convincing arguments.
 
I don't think he has committed to serving only one term. Nor do I think it's a good idea to come out and say it at this point, even if he ultimately decides to not run for relection.


Exactlty. When you have a 78 year old POTUS, changes of Veep having to take over increase dramatically. And thus it's stupid to push some state legislator from an uncontested district to be one heartbeat away.

For the most part, the allegations against Biden seem relatively trivial —with the exception of the allegation by Tara Reade.
And she seems about as trustworthy as Jean Carroll. Which is to say, not at all.

If Ms. Carroll were the only woman to allege sexual assault against Trump, I’d say you had kind of a point. The truth is that we have Trump himself bragging about sexually assaulting women.
 
If is a verified fact that Trump is an amoral sexual predator. Aside from the twenty-odd women who have publicly accused him (which means there are likely three to four times that amount who are too terrified to come forward); the fact that we know Trump has paid and solicited several pornstars to fuck him while married; his first wife accused him of rape (then was likely threatened into modifying her words); Trump himself has verified it.

But none of that matters to Trump supporters/the GOP since they are all primarily the predators themselves and the impotent cucks so pathetically desperate to be like them that they end up being Renfield to their Dracula.

So it’s unmistakably clear that this tactic is just that; a hypocritical attempt to appeal to the only people in America that actually do give a shit about the mistreatment of women, Democrats. And it’s the only tactic they have. They can’t beat Biden on policy; intellect; experience; qualifications; etc. They can’t beat Biden without cheating and blackmailing foreign countries into committing outright fraud.

All they have is hypocritical whataboutism and false equivalence that didn’t work in the nineties and won’t work today precisely because of the #metoo movement making all of us far more aware of what does—and does not—rise to certain levels of unacceptable behavior.

They are desperate and losing already and they know it and every time they post a “creepy Joe” graphic it’s a giant sign that reads: WE HAVE NOTHING ELSE
 
If Ms. Carroll were the only woman to allege sexual assault against Trump, I’d say you had kind of a point.
Neither does existence of other accusations (and it's only accusations, we have no indictments, much less convictions) strengthen EJC's case, as she can easily be a copycat accuser.

The truth is that we have Trump himself bragging about sexually assaulting women.
The quote is that women let celebrities "grab them by the pussy". I read that quote as commentary on power of celebrity rather than admission of sexual assault.
 
If Ms. Carroll were the only woman to allege sexual assault against Trump, I’d say you had kind of a point.
Neither does existence of other accusations (and it's only accusations, we have no indictments, much less convictions) strengthen EJC's case, as she can easily be a copycat accuser.

The truth is that we have Trump himself bragging about sexually assaulting women.
The quote is that women let celebrities "grab them by the pussy". I read that quote as commentary on power of celebrity rather than admission of sexual assault.

Harvey Weinstein says, "Yeah, that's what it was."
 
If Ms. Carroll were the only woman to allege sexual assault against Trump, I’d say you had kind of a point.
Neither does existence of other accusations (and it's only accusations, we have no indictments, much less convictions) strengthen EJC's case, as she can easily be a copycat accuser.

Why on earth would she be a 'copy cat accuser?' Certainly other accusations do not prove that Trump assaulted Carroll but the sheer volume of accusations does lend credence to claims.

The truth is that we have Trump himself bragging about sexually assaulting women.
The quote is that women let celebrities "grab them by the pussy". I read that quote as commentary on power of celebrity rather than admission of sexual assault.

I'm sure that's how you read it. I read it as that women 'let' you grab them in the same way that I read that he didn't 'rape' his former wife because at the time, there was no such thing as spousal rape. And I read it exactly the same way as I read "I moved on her like a bitch. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married." and "I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."

And the same way that I've heard men in my own life insist that a woman couldn't really be raped because if you succeeded, it was because she gave in and therefore, it wasn't rape. Apparently the only way a woman can be said to have defended herself against a rape according to some is to be beaten to death and leave him with a dead corpse.

In other words, it's all the mad ramblings of someone who doesn't think that women have the right to say no and have no need/desire to actually see if the woman is consenting or agreeable. Clearly if she were not, she'd allow you to beat her to death.
 
Back
Top Bottom