Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 44,198
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
Impossible? Then why in the heck are people allowed to sell these things?You're setting an impossible burden.I don't want to go after anyone. I want the guy selling people guns to be fucking certain that the person they are selling to isn't intent on murder a dozen people. Putting liability on the dealer makes the dealer have skin in the game, his skin. So the idea is that a dealer is less likely to just sell to anyone.Point #4B--holding dealers accountable. In other words, the regulators aren't doing their jobs. Note the outliers, look at them and see if they're actually miscreants or just outliers. Look at what has happened with the crackdown on pill mill docs--they're actually nailing the chronic pain docs and that's lead to a lot of suicides without any proof the docs did wrong.
Of course, being against this isn't about legal liability. It has fuck all to do with that. It has to do with the situation that if a guns dealer is liable for a mass murder committed by a person he just sold guns to... he is less likely to sell guns, which will mean less profit. And the gun lobby can't have that.
Gun rights activist: I'm sorry that you lost your daughter in that mass shooting, but if we expected all gun dealers to sell only to parties they knew weren't a danger to society, then they wouldn't make enough money to be gun dealers.
Mother: And I thought I knew how awful things could be because my daughter was just murdered. Won't someone think of the gun dealers?!