Guess I can upgrade that musket that Vance is telling me to pick up.
Why not upgrade it to a Minuteman III ICBM, with a W87 mod 1, 475 kiloton yield, thermonuclear warhead?Guess I can upgrade that musket that Vance is telling me to pick up.
But it tells us what kind of dipshits are on our courts.From the article, this is probably not going to get past the next court of appeals.
Extremely few people are hurt by machine guns. It’s hardly worth our attention and certainly not worth the political capital to seek a ban.
Don't be stupid. The Founding Fathers clearly supported the right to self-defense with weapons "up to the limit of 15 kilotons".Why not upgrade it to a Minuteman III ICBM, with a W87 mod 1, 475 kiloton yield, thermonuclear warhead?Guess I can upgrade that musket that Vance is telling me to pick up.
They are scheduled for replacement over the next few years, and it appears that you have the inalienable right granted by the second amendment to keep and bear such things.
What else would “well-regulated militia” mean??Don't be stupid. The Founding Fathers clearly supported the right to self-defense with weapons "up to the limit of 15 kilotons".Why not upgrade it to a Minuteman III ICBM, with a W87 mod 1, 475 kiloton yield, thermonuclear warhead?Guess I can upgrade that musket that Vance is telling me to pick up.
They are scheduled for replacement over the next few years, and it appears that you have the inalienable right granted by the second amendment to keep and bear such things.
You ever try to bear an ICBM? It weighs 40 tons. Sounds like a Loretta right.Why not upgrade it to a Minuteman III ICBM, with a W87 mod 1, 475 kiloton yield, thermonuclear warhead?Guess I can upgrade that musket that Vance is telling me to pick up.
They are scheduled for replacement over the next few years, and it appears that you have the inalienable right granted by the second amendment to keep and bear such things.
That's just for the missile -- W87 mod 1 warheads are expected* to cost $20 million apiece. Also, you're not counting profit margin -- the 2nd Amendment guarantees your right to keep arms if you own them, and your right to bear arms if your back's up to it, but there's nothing in there about a right to have the government sell them to you at cost...You might need to save up; at $7 million each, they are fairly expensive. But can you really put a price tag* on ...
*Of course you can. It would read "$7,000,000 plus tax".
Up at the ski lodge.That's fucking crazy.
I want my Howitzer. Where's my Howitzer?
And I mean come on... It's been decades since anyone has been hurt at all by a nuclear weapon. Hardly worth the political capital to keep them under control either (I know yours was sarcasm; so was mine. Or it better have been.)Extremely few people are hurt by machine guns. It’s hardly worth our attention and certainly not worth the political capital to seek a ban.
Alaska DOT used to use an old 105. Now I think they use sonic blaster hung from a helicopter.Up at the ski lodge.That's fucking crazy.
I want my Howitzer. Where's my Howitzer?
Although I believe ours uses recoilless rifles, not howitzers. Artillery is the tool of choice for avalanche control. And, yes, they are in private hands. (Admittedly, though, always handled by ex soldiers who were trained on artillery by the Army.)
No not at all. My thinking has been corrected by several trustworthy posters here that no small problem need be addressed until all the larger ones are solved. It’s only logical given the zero-sum game that gun control legislation by definition is. Right??!!11?And I mean come on... It's been decades since anyone has been hurt at all by a nuclear weapon. Hardly worth the political capital to keep them under control either (I know yours was sarcasm; so was mine. Or it better have been.)Extremely few people are hurt by machine guns. It’s hardly worth our attention and certainly not worth the political capital to seek a ban.
If I buy 1 I could drag it to Australia and attached it to our electrical grid giving us our 1st MNR on the grid.Why not upgrade it to a Minuteman III ICBM, with a W87 mod 1, 475 kiloton yield, thermonuclear warhead?Guess I can upgrade that musket that Vance is telling me to pick up.
Nuclear weapons are not reactors. They don't, and can't, make electricity.If I buy 1 I could drag it to Australia and attached it to our electrical grid giving us our 1st MNR on the grid.Why not upgrade it to a Minuteman III ICBM, with a W87 mod 1, 475 kiloton yield, thermonuclear warhead?Guess I can upgrade that musket that Vance is telling me to pick up.
This is the Tale of Frederick WermyssIf you could make atomic bombs by mistake, the Manhattan Project would have taken a couple of months, and cost a few thousand bucks.
If you put it on a wheel in a cage and propped a photo of the Soviet Union in front of it, you probably could get some electricity from the wheel as it ran to get to the "Soviet Union".Nuclear weapons are not reactors. They don't, and can't, make electricity.If I buy 1 I could drag it to Australia and attached it to our electrical grid giving us our 1st MNR on the grid.Why not upgrade it to a Minuteman III ICBM, with a W87 mod 1, 475 kiloton yield, thermonuclear warhead?Guess I can upgrade that musket that Vance is telling me to pick up.
Jarhyn was making the recommendation that we as a society should have areas designated for people who want to be lawless anarchists, but still be supported by society and have their needs seen to. So basically, an enclave for antisocial outlaws to be supported at everyone else's expense.How do you find it racist??I find your implied analogy to be both tasteless and borderline racist.The have their own laws and legal systems.You think native american tribal lands are lawless areas
So do Hells Angels.
I read it as simply giving an example of a separate legal system that most everyone would agree is not good.
You inferred that. I implied that each (Hells Angels and NA Lands) has their own internal governance. The former doesn't official own territory, they are outlaws straight up, but Native Americans on their own lands are exempt from most laws governing the EuroNazi invaders.You implied that tribal lands are like that - lawless areas of antisocial people being supported by the fruit of other people's labor.
Yup. And European Americans, same thing. They have their own government, it is associated with violence, drug trafficking and criminality so "general" that they nominated a 34x felon as their candidate to lead it. They ain't about to let no damn BLM gay libtards take it over, neither!Then you went on to further compare native americans to a biker gang that has a history of being associated with violence, drug trafficking, and general criminality.
You wanna give them back their beads and let them have Manhattan? No? Then you do the same as you accuse me of.you double down by saying that "most everyone agrees" that granting the original inhabitants of the country rights to their own lands and own autonomous governance is "not good".