• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Breakdown In Civil Order

It's just the mass detainment of three thousand American citizens who have committed no crime and theft of their property, why don't liberals have more of a sense of humor? :rolleyes:

I don't do days off.
 
It was a rhetorical question the same way "why is the sky blue?" is a rhetorical question
Rayleigh scattering of sunlight by Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules, whose dimensions are ideal for scattering electromagnetic radiation at the red end of the visible light spectrum, such that mostly it is the blue and violet end of the spectrum that reaches the ground, and hence our eyes. The incident sunlight at the red end of the spectrum is preferentially guided 'around' the edges of the planet by this mechanism, which is why both sunrises/sunsets, and the Moon during a total lunar eclipse, appear red.
 
Imagine putting a $5/gallon tax on gas and diesel to fund the efforts to eliminate homelessness. How far do you suppose that would get with people like TSwizzle?
Tom
So poorly, that what Newsom did instead was to fund a massive anti-homelessness measure by gutting county mental health services. A more clear cut instance of robbing one Peter to pay another Peter could scarcely be conceived.
 
It was a rhetorical question the same way "why is the sky blue?" is a rhetorical question
Rayleigh scattering of sunlight by Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules, whose dimensions are ideal for scattering electromagnetic radiation at the red end of the visible light spectrum, such that mostly it is the blue and violet end of the spectrum that reaches the ground, and hence our eyes. The incident sunlight at the red end of the spectrum is preferentially guided 'around' the edges of the planet by this mechanism, which is why both sunrises/sunsets, and the Moon during a total lunar eclipse, appear red.
Correct. And homeless people are a complex and heterogeneous group, but no one thinks the sidewalk is their forever home. These encampments are routinely raided and harassed, and the people who live in them live difficult lives for a host of reasons. Most are trying earnestly to get out, but a person still needs somewhere to sleep at night if they do not have a home. Most of the encampments do not have much of a "permanent population", though there is some regularity to life in an encampment. There has to be, that's how humans operate and how the police keep the situation under dubious control.
 
Most are trying earnestly to get out,
but a person still needs somewhere to sleep at night if they do not have a home. Most of the encampments do not have much of a "permanent population", though there is some regularity to life in an encampment. There has to be, that's how humans operate and how the police keep the situation under dubious control.

They need to go into the shelters and the sidewalks cleared. Why you want to have these people live in these miserable conditions is beyond me.
 
Most are trying earnestly to get out,
but a person still needs somewhere to sleep at night if they do not have a home. Most of the encampments do not have much of a "permanent population", though there is some regularity to life in an encampment. There has to be, that's how humans operate and how the police keep the situation under dubious control.

They need to go into the shelters and the sidewalks cleared. Why you want to have these people live in these miserable conditions is beyond me.
I want people to have homes, dude. Not jail cells. If there were enough shelters, we wouldn't have encampments, but shelters are not a good end goal either. Have you ever spent time in one? Can you imagine living the rest of your life there? Shelters are a start, and we should certainly building them, more and better, but a homeless American is in need of more than just a shelter for tomorrow night. The United States has, in failing to meaningfully regulate the housing market or otherwise prevent it from becoming a casino, failed to provide sufficient housing for all of its citizens on a catastrophic scale. Your solutions aren't solutions, because they do not address the problem.
 
I want people to have homes, dude.

And I want to live in Beverly Hills. You sound like a toddler having a tantrum, dude.


Not jail cells.


Unlikely any of them will end up in jail.

If there were enough shelters, we wouldn't have encampments, but shelters are not a good end goal either. Have you ever spent time in one?

Living in a tent on the sidewalk is not a good end goal.

Can you imagine living the rest of your life there? Shelters are a start, and we should certainly building them, more and better, but a homeless American is in need of more than just a shelter for tomorrow night. The United States has, in failing to meaningfully regulate the housing market or otherwise prevent it from becoming a casino, failed to provide sufficient housing for all of its citizens on a catastrophic scale. Your solutions aren't solutions, because they do not address the problem.

Do you think that allowing several million “migrants” into the country helps the housing situation?
 
It was a rhetorical question the same way "why is the sky blue?" is a rhetorical question
Rayleigh scattering of sunlight by Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules, whose dimensions are ideal for scattering electromagnetic radiation at the red end of the visible light spectrum, such that mostly it is the blue and violet end of the spectrum that reaches the ground, and hence our eyes. The incident sunlight at the red end of the spectrum is preferentially guided 'around' the edges of the planet by this mechanism, which is why both sunrises/sunsets, and the Moon during a total lunar eclipse, appear red.
Correct.
yikes!!😳
 
Back
Top Bottom