Apparently, spin matters more.
The only link between crime and the closure of these stores, is an hypothesis being proposed by the Daily Mail, that is contradicted by the plain text of the Walmart announcement, which tells us that the closure is "because they were not meeting financial expectations".
The only evidence they have is a vague reference to a comment made months ago by the CEO (what, exactly did he say? Did he mention these two stores specifically? Did he mention Portland? Or did he just happen to mention, months ago, that thefts were increasing at Walmart stores in general?).
The other part that was bolded is pure speculation; They don't even dare to draw a connection themselves, and just insinuate it using the weasel word "amid".
When you're being manipulated so effectively that you start evangelising for the manipulator, it's clear that you aren't in the habit of looking for signs that you are being misled. But those signs are so glaring in that text, that I find it astonishing that anyone could read it without rolling their eyes so hard that they can see their brain.
Was going to observe all of this myself, then saw you'd beaten me to it.
Also, am I supposed to feel sad that a fucking
Walmart is closing? Talk about policies that hurt those they're aimed at... is the idea here that we should be bending over backwards to
hold on to small-business-murdering megastores? Walmart does have unique problems with shoplifting, and always has. This is partly because people fucking hate them, partly due to the popular perception that stealing from Walmart is a victimless crime, and partly because they destroy the economic life surrounding them for miles upon miles while making themselves the most common yet least loved employer of the down and out. The metastatic cancer of American retail.