repoman
Contributor
This is an old point that is making the rounds about how many co-morbidities that 94% of covid deaths involved, as I was listening to a podcast where this was raised again.
Many of those are what happened by the time of death from all the complications from getting covid not previous to covid right? Obviously not all as in a patient having a decade of high pressure pressure. But if someone had 125/80 before illness and it went up to 180/120 a day before death, HBP especially "underlying HBP" should not be listed as a co-morbidity.
Not a fan of either side (as if there should even be sides for this issue) cherry picking and using semantic tricks to win a debate. What is even won?
Well, since about that percentage (mid to high 90s) of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths due to COVID are unvaccinated, not sure how this "point that is making the rounds" (where? GETTR?) is even relevant unless you're saying that getting the vaccination removes co-morbidities. Do you think it does?
Ah, sorry I meant WAS making the rounds. This was referred to in recent podcasts when it was already old news.
But the point I meant is that not digging into the data even one layer deep is what is wrong and it happening all over the place.
What is even worse is that people get entrenched into defending a position they never would have taken if they had found an unbiased factual source about the information and spent a couple sessions reading and reflecting over. Something like what the San Jose Mercury News at least used to be and maybe still is. A while ago at least it was top notch.
Fox/DM/NY Post would likely included all covid caused comorbidites as "underlying" and CNN may have a tendency to not even want to include longstanding ones at all or ignore the report.
And if this is being done as part of not want to give ammunition to the other side that is terrible.