Measurement error.
In all probability the only one that belongs on this list is Galveston and even that's uncertain. The others are in October 1918.
We don't have a day-by-day breakdown but the Spanish Flu averaged 6,290/day during that month.
675k died in the US from the Spanish flu. Did they forget to look at those numbers?
675k died in the US from the Spanish flu. Did they forget to look at those numbers?
They did not all die on the same day.
They did not all die on the same day.
But did more than 2403 die from Spanish flu on any given day?
They did not all die on the same day.
But did more than 2403 die from Spanish flu on any given day?
Almost certainly in Oct 1918 when almost 200,000 died in that one month in the US. That averages 6500 per day. It hit in two waves. But Woodrow Wilson tried to cover it up. My guess is that there are no daily records kept. Averages would be the best data.
Anyway, it's only called the Spanish Flu because Spain was not in WWI and didn't cover it up. The waring powers did cover it up.
Most who study the great influenza of 1918 believe it originated in the US..
Almost certainly in Oct 1918 when almost 200,000 died in that one month in the US. That averages 6500 per day. It hit in two waves. But Woodrow Wilson tried to cover it up. My guess is that there are no daily records kept. Averages would be the best data.
Anyway, it's only called the Spanish Flu because Spain was not in WWI and didn't cover it up. The waring powers did cover it up.
Most who study the great influenza of 1918 believe it originated in the US..
Let's face it - the point stands, but the meme is wrong and getting more wrong every day.
Yesterday 3265 Americans were reported dead from COVID-19.
2981 the day before...
Yes the point is valid. The US is being hit by a 9/11 or Pearl Harbor scale event almost every day now and Trump ismostlyCompletely ignoring it.
Yes the point is valid. The US is being hit by a 9/11 or Pearl Harbor scale event almost every day now and Trump ismostlyCompletely ignoring it.
FTFY
Yes the point is valid. The US is being hit by a 9/11 or Pearl Harbor scale event almost every day now and Trump ismostlyCompletely ignoring it.
FTFY
I gave him slight leeway for having a vaccine task force but he's trying to meddle with the FDA and declined Pfizer's offer for more doses a while back.
It's truly strange. On the one hand he denies the existence of a serious public health crisis but on the other he want's full credit for a vaccine. That alone should short-circuit his supporter's brains. If they have one.
675k died in the US from the Spanish flu. Did they forget to look at those numbers?
Yes the point is valid. The US is being hit by a 9/11 or Pearl Harbor scale event almost every day now and Trump ismostlyCompletely ignoring it.
FTFY
675k died in the US from the Spanish flu. Did they forget to look at those numbers?
That is about one-day death tolls--something we don't have for the Spanish Flu.
However, the numbers from October 1918 almost certainly occupy at least 7 of the 8 slots on that list.
Note that it's another disease that got a lot of the same garbage we are seeing from the right at present. Don't take a pandemic seriously = death tolls for the record books.
Yes the point is valid. The US is being hit by a 9/11 or Pearl Harbor scale event almost every day now and Trump ismostlyCompletely ignoring it.
FTFY
No. He's ordering the head of the FDA to approve the vaccine immediately. That's not "completely ignoring" even though it's not a sensible action.
I see no reason to think there's an actual change, just poor data.
I see no reason to think there's an actual change, just poor data.
Post-Thanksgiving data were a mess, sure. Before Thanksgiving the curve started to flatten already though. And now we are past the messy data period, and sure enough, we are not exponential. With exponential growth the curve must get steeper and steeper, but after a post-Thanksgiving spike (mostly catching up to the Thanksgiving slump in reporting but also some Thanksgiving transmission - idiots!) the curve has flattened again.
View attachment 30737
The daily deaths are also promising.
View attachment 30738
Look more carefully. We have a up-down-up blip from Thanksgiving, then a return to the baseline. No respite.
"Flattening" as in "not increasing as quickly as it was". Barely.
While individual days (which are erratic) may spike above 250k/d, the 7 day average is very unlikely to. It's below 220k/d now, and it is unlikely to increase that much before the peak.Thank god for that, but it still looks like the infection rate is going to top out beyond 250k/day. (246k on Friday, up "only" around 5% from the previous Friday... which is good news).
Where did you read that? Late Spring is first three weeks of June basically. That seems overly pessimistic, considering that Pfizer has already been approved and Moderna will most likely follow shortly. WIll will likely vaccinate in the neighborhood of 10 million healthcare workers by the end of the year. Tens of millions more should be vaccinated by March 1st.Now that it is projected that it will be "late spring" before the first 100m vaccinations will be administered, this promises to drag out even longer than anticipated.
Yes, we surely should not relax too much.Hopefully that projection will strike an appropriate note of caution and people will not relax their mask-wearing and social distancing prematurely.
Looking at the slope of previous decreases in new cases after lockdowns were in place, we have to hope for much steeper declines from the stratospheric levels we have now, or it will be mid-summer before we get down to "first peak" levels.
If we cut the new infection rate in half every two months starting today, it will be eight months before we get down to the neighborhood of 15k/day.