To Give You a Size of the Immense and Growing Size of Illegal Immigration

[Emily Lake]

Children, elderly, disabled, caregivers, or others with no ability to work or interest in doing so.

Fuck the children, fuck the old people, fuck the home-makers, amirite? If you aren't working in a factory or a field somewhere, you're valueless, Even if you are a mother, a grandfather, or even a future factory worker, you are contemptible and disposable if you aren't currently making money for some rich fucker or another.

Why do you feel the need to immediately resort to ad hominems and malice? Why do you feel that it is reasonable or appropriate to assume that anyone with a concern is an evil person?

Honestly, just skip all of the attempts at reason and go ahead and call people evil apostates who should be burned at the stake.

 

[RVonse]

Children, elderly, disabled, caregivers, or others with no ability to work or interest in doing so.

Fuck the children, fuck the old people, fuck the home-makers, amirite? If you aren't working in a factory or a field somewhere, you're valueless, Even if you are a mother, a grandfather, or even a future factory worker, you are contemptible and disposable if you aren't currently making money for some rich fucker or another.

Why do you feel the need to immediately resort to ad hominems and malice? Why do you feel that it is reasonable or appropriate to assume that anyone with a concern is an evil person?

Honestly, just skip all of the attempts at reason and go ahead and call people evil apostates who should be burned at the stake.

That is what the left and main stream legacy media do so well. They are experts to vilify anyone not perfectly in line with their narrative.

For example Eisenhower is even before my time, but history shows him more like Trump than any other recent POTUS: https://www.history.com/news/operation-wetback-eisenhower-1954-deportation

Can you imagine what current main stream legacy media would be saying about Eisenhower today? They would be foaming at the mouth claiming Eisenhower was a "fascist racist pig" and giving him the title of white supremacist leader. You know it and I know it.

And also note Eisenhower was a registered Republican and post WW2 general. Yet very anti-war politically unlike our current Democrats. He would NOT be throwing money into Ukraine right now there would be some kind of peace made with Putin.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Children, elderly, disabled, caregivers, or others with no ability to work or interest in doing so.

Fuck the children, fuck the old people, fuck the home-makers, amirite? If you aren't working in a factory or a field somewhere, you're valueless, Even if you are a mother, a grandfather, or even a future factory worker, you are contemptible and disposable if you aren't currently making money for some rich fucker or another.

Why do you feel the need to immediately resort to ad hominems and malice? Why do you feel that it is reasonable or appropriate to assume that anyone with a concern is an evil person?

Honestly, just skip all of the attempts at reason and go ahead and call people evil apostates who should be burned at the stake.

That is what the left and main stream legacy media do so well.

You posted an OP saying the Left stole the election in 2020 and were going to do it again in 2024. Who do you think you are kidding?

And also note Eisenhower was a registered Republican and post WW2 general. Yet very anti-war politically unlike our current Democrats. He would NOT be throwing money into Ukraine right now there would be some kind of peace made with Putin.

Eisenhower warned of the Military Industrial Complex. They doesn't mean he'd support Russia by allowing them to annex Ukraine by force. He didn't give South Korea to North Korea.

 

[ZiprHead]

And also note Eisenhower was a registered Republican and post WW2 general. Yet very anti-war politically unlike our current Democrats. He would NOT be throwing money into Ukraine right now there would be some kind of peace made with Putin.

Do not put words or thoughts into someone else. You have no idea what Eisenhower would do about Ukraine. He was president during the cold war.

 

[RVonse]

That is what the left and main stream legacy media do so well.

You posted an OP saying the Left stole the election in 2020 and were going to do it again in 2024. Who do you think you are kidding?

I was never claiming anyone is a monster or a sub human turd. That anyone should be burned at the stake. Just making the effort to enlighten the other side how election corruption is possible without being able to prove it.

 

[RVonse]

And also note Eisenhower was a registered Republican and post WW2 general. Yet very anti-war politically unlike our current Democrats. He would NOT be throwing money into Ukraine right now there would be some kind of peace made with Putin.

Do not put words or thoughts into someone else. You have no idea what Eisenhower would do about Ukraine. He was president during the cold war.

There is no question he was thoroughly against the military industrial complex. And the (current) left is just the opposite.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

That is what the left and main stream legacy media do so well.

You posted an OP saying the Left stole the election in 2020 and were going to do it again in 2024. Who do you think you are kidding?

I was never claiming anyone is a monster or a sub human turd. That anyone should be burned at the stake. Just making the effort to enlighten the other side how election corruption is possible without being able to prove it.

You claimed that one of the major political parties conspired to steal and actually stole the Federal Election in 2020, and was doing likewise in 2024. With absolutely no evidence whatsoever, forget about proving it. That isn't some minor accusation.

 

[Patooka]

I was never claiming anyone is a monster or a sub human turd. That anyone should be burned at the stake.

I know this is probably a waste of effort, but cite?

Just making the effort to enlighten the other side how election corruption is possible without being able to prove it.

I love how you just glossed over that last bit as though that's no big thing. When did you stop child trafficking? I've no proof you did something like that, but it's possible that you did so personally I find human traffickers like yourself to be pretty reprehensible. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Note to mods - I'm not accusing RVonse of being a human trafficker; I'm just saying it's possible.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I was never claiming anyone is a monster or a sub human turd. That anyone should be burned at the stake.

I know this is probably a waste of effort, but cite?

Just making the effort to enlighten the other side how election corruption is possible without being able to prove it.

I love how you just glossed over that last bit as though that's no big thing. When did you stop child trafficking? I've no proof you did something like that, but it's possible that you did so personally I find human traffickers like yourself to be pretty reprehensible. You should be ashamed of yourself.

To make things clear, while a charge of child trafficking is kind of big, Patooka did not say RVonse was a monster or a sub human turd.

 

[Patooka]

I was never claiming anyone is a monster or a sub human turd. That anyone should be burned at the stake.

I know this is probably a waste of effort, but cite?

Just making the effort to enlighten the other side how election corruption is possible without being able to prove it.

I love how you just glossed over that last bit as though that's no big thing. When did you stop child trafficking? I've no proof you did something like that, but it's possible that you did so personally I find human traffickers like yourself to be pretty reprehensible. You should be ashamed of yourself.

To make things clear, while a charge of child trafficking is kind of big, Patooka did not say RVonse was a monster or a sub human turd.

Or that I advocate burning at the stake.

 

[bilby]

That is what the left and main stream legacy media do so well.

You posted an OP saying the Left stole the election in 2020 and were going to do it again in 2024. Who do you think you are kidding?

I was never claiming anyone is a monster or a sub human turd. That anyone should be burned at the stake. Just making the effort to enlighten the other side how election corruption is possible without being able to prove it.

It's possible that you are a flesh-eating cyborg sent from the future to destroy humanity. I can't prove it though. Because it's fundamentally untrue, just like the unprovable "possibility" that the left stole the election in 2020.

Election corruption is possible. But it's almost impossible to do without leaving behind proof. We know this, because many corrupt individuals have been proven to have attempted to cast unlawful votes in 2020 - all of them Republicans.

If you have evidence that the left stole the 2020 election, then present it. If not, I strongly advise you to stop making that unsupported and unsupportable claim, as this carries a real risk of making you look like a lying arsehole.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I was never claiming anyone is a monster or a sub human turd. That anyone should be burned at the stake.

I know this is probably a waste of effort, but cite?

Just making the effort to enlighten the other side how election corruption is possible without being able to prove it.

I love how you just glossed over that last bit as though that's no big thing. When did you stop child trafficking? I've no proof you did something like that, but it's possible that you did so personally I find human traffickers like yourself to be pretty reprehensible. You should be ashamed of yourself.

To make things clear, while a charge of child trafficking is kind of big, Patooka did not say RVonse was a monster or a sub human turd.

Or that I advocate burning at the stake.

Meh, that just means you aren't from Texas.

 

[ZiprHead]

And also note Eisenhower was a registered Republican and post WW2 general. Yet very anti-war politically unlike our current Democrats. He would NOT be throwing money into Ukraine right now there would be some kind of peace made with Putin.

Do not put words or thoughts into someone else. You have no idea what Eisenhower would do about Ukraine. He was president during the cold war.

There is no question he was thoroughly against the military industrial complex.

The MIC is not the same as anti-war.

And the (current) left is just the opposite.

Really? What wars has the current left started? The last wars we were in were Afghanistan and Iraq, both started by and cheered on by Republicans.

Biden actually got us out of Afghanistan.

 

[laughing dog]

Children, elderly, disabled, caregivers, or others with no ability to work or interest in doing so.

Fuck the children, fuck the old people, fuck the home-makers, amirite? If you aren't working in a factory or a field somewhere, you're valueless, Even if you are a mother, a grandfather, or even a future factory worker, you are contemptible and disposable if you aren't currently making money for some rich fucker or another.

Why do you feel the need to immediately resort to ad hominems and malice? Why do you feel that it is reasonable or appropriate to assume that anyone with a concern is an evil person?

Honestly, just skip all of the attempts at reason and go ahead and call people evil apostates who should be burned at the stake.

That is what the left and main stream legacy media do so well. They are experts to vilify anyone not perfectly in line with their narrative.

They learned it from Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

And also note Eisenhower was a registered Republican and post WW2 general. Yet very anti-war politically unlike our current Democrats. He would NOT be throwing money into Ukraine right now there would be some kind of peace made with Putin.

What evidence do you have that leads you to believe that Eisenhower would be Russia’s bitch?

 

[laughing dog]

That is what the left and main stream legacy media do so well.

You posted an OP saying the Left stole the election in 2020 and were going to do it again in 2024. Who do you think you are kidding?

I was never claiming anyone is a monster or a sub human turd. That anyone should be burned at the stake. Just making the effort to enlighten the other side how election corruption is possible without being able to prove it.

It's possible that you are a flesh-eating cyborg sent from the future to destroy humanity. I can't prove it though. Because it's fundamentally untrue, just like the unprovable "possibility" that the left stole the election in 2020.

Election corruption is possible. But it's almost impossible to do without leaving behind proof. We know this, because many corrupt individuals have been proven to have attempted to cast unlawful votes in 2020 - all of them Republicans.

If you have evidence that the left stole the 2020 election, then present it. If not, I strongly advise you to stop making that unsupported and unsupportable claim, as this carries a real risk of making you look like a lying arsehole.

Where have you been these last 4 years? Tge evidence is many people are saying it!!

 

[RVonse]

Britain Is Proof: Globalists Plan To Use Migrants as a Mercenary Army Against The West - LewRockwell

Why do western officials insist on gaslighting the public on illegal border crossings? Why do they attempt to destroy anyone that publicly opposes mass immigration from the third world? The laws on the books support the public’s majority position on immigration – Come here legally or don’t come...

www.lewrockwell.com

You would never know it from main stream news but the UK is having many riots over their open border policy right now. We can learn from the experience of the UK. From this article:

"I have mentioned this in previous articles and I continue to believe that one of the main purposes for the establishment to leave borders open and entice illegals to enter is to create a migrant army; a situation in which millions of illegals will be offered easy citizenship in exchange for service. I also believe that this migrant army will be used against the American public (the real citizenry) to impose martial law measures in the wake of a national disaster…

For example, third-world cultures are intrinsically violent and authoritarian. The top 20 most violent nations and most oppressive nations in the world are also the same nations sending caravans of migrants our way. Progressives will claim that’s a good thing and that we need to help these people. It’s not a good thing and most of them can’t be helped because they aren’t coming here to be free, they are coming here to take whatever they can take.

The majority of people from these regions will never be able to coexist peacefully within western communities. They don’t understand freedom, they don’t understand diplomacy, they don’t understand compromise. For them, tolerance is not a virtue, it’s a weakness that can be exploited to their advantage. This is a fact proven time and time again as mass migrations accelerates and I think my theory has recently been vindicated by events in the UK.

British citizens have been victimized for over a decade by migrant attacks and organized crime. The two-tier policing system in the UK continues to protect these migrants from retribution while the government hides statistics that show how much violence is being committed by non-citizens."

But fortunately the prospects for the US may be better than the UK because of our 2nd amendment. More from this article:

"Regardless of the outcome of the US elections in November the illegal immigration crisis will be central to everything we do in the next couple years. If leftists remain in political power then it is likely that we will see a similar attempt at a crackdown on patriots from an arrogant Harris Administration.

I believe Harris will most definitely offer citizenship to every illegal already in the country (many of them in exchange for military service), buying a mercenary force and a progressive voting block at the same time, ending any chance of conservatives ever participating in government again.

In the case of a second Trump Administration the situation changes. The removal of illegal migrants will be the top issue and leftists in the US will try to prevent it. They view the migrants as the key to their kingdom; the way to “destroy capitalism” and bring in woke socialism. Removal of illegals would set them back decades. Leftists will riot rather than lose. It’s a certainty.

The difference is, US patriots are armed (50 million strong with over 400 million guns and hundreds of billions of rounds of ammunition). I’m now receiving a lot of emails these days from UK and European readers who say they are desperate for the same firearms rights we have in the US. They all tell me, “never give up your guns.” Don’t worry, we won’t. We know what’s coming thanks to the events in the UK."

 

[Politesse]

crackdown on patriots

"Patriots", who are amassing arms to attack their national government and commit acts of terrorism against its citizens



Quick, find me the smallest violin ever carved.

APOPLECTIC EDIT: I mean, you're seriously asking me to shit on military veterans, who you claim do not even deserve citizenship, in favor of the "rights" of domestic terrorists? wtf?

 

[Politesse]

The top 20 most violent nations and most oppressive nations in the world are also the same nations sending caravans of migrants our way.

It's really annoying to me when people post links that contradict their own point.

The link offered lists out the 13 most violent nations as:

Afghanistan
Yemen
Syria
South Sudan
DR Congo
Russia
Ukraine
Somalia
Sudan
Iraq
Mali
Central African Republic
Ethiopia

None of which countries have ever sent, nor could send, a "caravan" of migrants to the United States. But I would also be happy to offer a safe harbor to anyone who manages to escape any of those places. If you supported the invasion of Iraq but refuse to accept the idea of refugees from Iraq, what the hell is wrong with you? You don't get to just reduce someone's country to rubble and accept no responsibility for the consequences, fuck that noise. We greenlit the murder of hundreds of thousands of people and the dehoming of millions in Iraq. Our victims deserve better than a low-rent apartment in Portland, but you're going to begrudge them even that?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

No one wonder you aren't very well read on this stuff, if Lew Rockwell is your source.

 

[jonatha]

The top 20 most violent nations and most oppressive nations in the world are also the same nations sending caravans of migrants our way.

It's really annoying to me when people post links that contradict their own point.

The link offered lists out the 13 most violent nations as:

Afghanistan
Yemen
Syria
South Sudan
DR Congo
Russia
Ukraine
Somalia
Sudan
Iraq
Mali
Central African Republic
Ethiopia

None of which countries have ever sent, nor could send, a "caravan" of migrants to the United States. But I would also be happy to offer a safe harbor to anyone who manages to escape any of those places. If you supported the invasion of Iraq but refuse to accept the idea of refugees from Iraq, what the hell is wrong with you? You don't get to just reduce someone's country to rubble and accept no responsibility for the consequences, fuck that noise. We greenlit the murder of hundreds of thousands of people and the dehoming of millions in Iraq. Our victims deserve better than a low-rent apartment in Portland, but you're going to begrudge them even that?

The article in the link refers to the UK, not the US.

Not that either has an "open borders" policy...