Wouldn't be needed to prove in realtime. It's just lying would be perjury and end up in jail.Great, but unenforceable.Debates are done under oath.
For one thing, proving the debator was lying about how big his -whatever- apartment, crowd, hands are rather than misinformed, and doing so in real time, is an impossible challenge.
For another, Trump don’t care about no stupid oath.
Unless you’re going to haul him off to the slammer in the next ten minutes, breaking an oath only means one thing:
grifting time!
Gotta litigate! Send today and get a cheesy nft.
Note how different the reich wing positions are in court (where they are typically immediately tossed because they have nothing but lies behind them) vs in public. I'm saying we should make politicians when acting formally be subject to the standards of the courtroom.