The twitter files themselves have become politicized at this point. You would think basic stuff like free speech and the bill of rights should be non partisan but it somehow isn't. But apparently (mostly due to Musk and Tabbi) Jim Jordan is heading up the weaponization of the federal government hearings here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_jh7EfqdzI&t=2026s
It will take even more time but all of your aforementioned questions should be coming out in due time.
I predict the democrats will be kicking and screaming the whole way...but this benefits everyone (them included) in the long run just like it benefits republicans. They just don't get it yet. Its not left vs right, its them vs us.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/30/opinion/jan-6-committee-report.html
That's a lot of words when you could have just as easily said, "When I said there was proof the FBI interfered with Twitter to influence an election result I was completely full of shit."
I'm aware of Jim Jordan's "investigation". I am also aware how much of a dishonest seditionist piece of shit he is. And don't fucking cry about "The Twitter Files" being politicized. It
was people like you and other bad faith actors who politicized it. Anyone with a shred of integrity would not take that crap seriously due to it's complete absence of names, dates and places. Here is what we
actually know that has come from this bullshit debacle;
-Whilst both Biden and Trump approached Twitter to take down stories, Biden was the only one who made sure it was his campaign staff to do so.
Trump deliberately took White House staff with other duties to perform this task. That might be legal, but it is certainly unethical and pretty reprehensible. I know exactly what you would say if the roles were reversed.
-The only time Biden's election team approached Twitter was to ask for
unsolicited dick pics of Hunter Biden be taken down. This had fuck all to do with the election, were distributed without Hunter Biden's consent and as such were illegal. In fairness, Twitter really shouldn't have been needed to be told they need to be taken down.
-However, during the election, Trump asked numerous times for tweets to be taken down, not because they were illegal like revenge porn but because they said mean things about him. The most notable example is a tweet from someone named
Chrissy Teigen for calling Trump a "pussy ass bitch". Which is actual suppression of free speech and a genuine violation of the First Amendment considering as we already know - Trump used Government staff to implement this
--Twitter deliberately ignored its own guideline in the lead up and during Jan6, supporting Trump and his Q-tard followers. This is
corroborated by sworn testimony from former Twitter staffer Anika Collier Navaroli. Her testimony has weight because she was the senior most content moderator in Twitter.
-Navaroli then went on to testify that
Twitter bent over backwards for years accommodating Trump despite numerous violations. Having said that, there was no need to listen to a senior Twitter manager testifying to know that. The evidence has been around that Twitter favoured Trump
for years.
-This didn't come from the hearings but I know it's going to be brought up in a pathetic attempt of whataboutism, Twitter did ban the Hunter Biden laptop story for a whole 24 hours. Other news outlets that didn't run with it at all were FOX news, The Wall Street Journal and NewsMax. In fact, the only media outlet that reported on it was The New York Post and
even they had doubts about the veracity of the story.
So instead of "proof" of a deep state conspiracy of Twitter working with the FBI to steal the election from Trump,
there is documented evidence that Twitter gave preferential treatment to Trump, over and above literally anyone else on the planet. People are willing to testify to this in front of Congress. And the cunt still couldn't help himself colouring outside the lines.
