James Brown
Veteran Member
Help me out here--statistics isn't my strength. But would this be a legitimate method of calculating...well, something?
Take a large, well-defined population base. Say, New York City, and make the two following calculations.
1. Number of Deaths in March 2019 divided by Population in March 2019.
2. Number of Deaths in March 2020 divided by Population in March 2020.
Compare the two figures. Would that be reasonably accurate? Assuming that "Non-COVID-19 Causes of Death" (i.e., heart disease, violence, accidents, etc.) remain the same from one year to the next (within a small variation range), then any difference could be called "COVID-19 Cause of Death," couldn't it?
This would account for cases like:
Take a large, well-defined population base. Say, New York City, and make the two following calculations.
1. Number of Deaths in March 2019 divided by Population in March 2019.
2. Number of Deaths in March 2020 divided by Population in March 2020.
Compare the two figures. Would that be reasonably accurate? Assuming that "Non-COVID-19 Causes of Death" (i.e., heart disease, violence, accidents, etc.) remain the same from one year to the next (within a small variation range), then any difference could be called "COVID-19 Cause of Death," couldn't it?
This would account for cases like:
- People who died in their bed from the virus, but never sought medical help.
- People who died in car accidents as they were driving to the hospital due to shortness of breath (brought on by COVID-19).
- Others that I haven't thought of, but deaths that we can blame on COVID-19 without testing corpses for antibodies.